Content lifecycle

Reading time 5 min

MarkStack stores/builds documentation. It does not assign review owners, enforce approval queues, send reminders, commit browser edits to Git or create per-page history. Keep those practices in a real source/review process and document their boundaries.

Lifecycle matrix

Stage Completion evidence
Define Reader need and success condition
Draft Complete source, not heading placeholders
Review Facts, risk, audience and source diff checked
Build Isolated artifact, no generation errors
Reader test Routes/search/media/tasks actually usable
Release Reviewed artifact on intended host
Maintain Real owner/date/version context
Retire Old link/asset behavior verified

A source save is not approval, publication or deployment. Shared administrator publisher includes saved source from every writer, not only selected page. A team needs a publishing agreement outside application: who reviews, who releases, what saved material is in scope and how rollback is handled.

Define one reader task

For fictional Field Guide: “A new teammate can verify installed tools before building.” Success means required Node version is clear, commands are read-only and run in stated shell, expected results are recognizable and missing-tool recovery is described.

Procedure section Purpose
Purpose/audience Who needs this and why
Prerequisites Required versions, permissions, context
Steps Complete sequence and exact target
Expected result How to recognize success
Failure How to diagnose without repeating blindly
Recovery Safe return/restore path and limits
Sources/related tasks Maintenance context and next task

A reference instead needs exact fields, defaults, bounds, precedence and errors. An example should teach one distinct scenario, not repeat boilerplate across many pages to appear longer. Keep command authority separate from documented command behavior.

Write and review source

Choose one maintainer in external workflow and keep source path, operating-system/version assumptions and evidence together. Unsupported ownership/status frontmatter is data only. Use visible notes or Git/review tools when decisions must be recoverable.

Review commands for working directory, shell, placeholders, effects and undo costs. Check exact path before deletion/output replacement. Review screenshots/download bytes for identities/keys/hidden metadata. Illustrative host/service snippets must say what was tested and what remains environment-specific.

For file/Git writing, inspect diff and build disposable output. For browser writing, confirm actual server source and preserve unsaved work before review. Save/Publish does not automatically produce a Git commit/PR. Ordinary Markdown Save has no stale revision merge; coordinate writers on shared pages.

Review evidence honestly

Claim Required evidence
Syntax-valid example Parser/tool accepted exact input
Working local example Actual local result inspected
Production service works Target service/permissions/network exercised
Reader accessible Intended user and denied-user host checks
Download correct Open actual returned bytes
Complete feature coverage Source branches/tests mapped, not word count

A systemd syntax check is not proof daemon starts under correct owner/sandbox/TLS. Local browser emulation is not physical Safari testing. A green build is not correct links/content/privacy. Keep those qualifiers next to example/result instead of turning prep into production claims.

Publish and release

  1. Reconcile all saved work included in shared input.
  2. Freeze reviewed source/artifact under chosen team process.
  3. Build isolated output and run link/anchor/search/resource checks.
  4. Inspect both themes and phone/desktop, diagrams and copied commands.
  5. Retain prior source/runtime/artifact and documented rollback route.
  6. Release through intended host method within authority.
  7. Verify actual root/deep/old routes and cache/resources.
  8. Record result, limitations and next owner action.

There is no built-in page-level approval gate or selective “only my saved page” publication. An external CI trigger must be documented as that pipeline’s behavior, not MarkStack’s automatic service. Review and release owns artifact/host checks.

Ownership and dates

Use updated only after actual factual/usability review. Do not bump every date on every build to make stale instructions look current. Record changed assumptions and the tested versions rather than implying indefinite freshness.

MarkStack does not enforce owner, expiry, review_due or approved metadata. If your organization needs enforcement, use an external workflow and describe it precisely. A search result/date is not approval or a production security certificate.

Import in a staging tree

Import item Review
Frontmatter YAML-only types/delimiters
Titles ASCII slug and collisions
.md links Rewrite to real reader routes
Fragments Generated heading IDs
Media Selected static bytes, audience and prefix
Remote assets Network/privacy/offline behavior
Unsupported dialect Rewrite or explicit limitation
Ownership Real maintainer/review record

Keep original recoverable and build new material separately before replacing live reader. Importing all files successfully is not completion if readers cannot follow tasks, diagrams fail or links go to old source platforms.

Non-Latin title/heading limits need actual generated-route review at this pin. Preview parser/plugin differences are not universal import validation. Do not enable executable frontmatter or raw HTML to bypass compatibility work.

Retire without dead ends

Choice Work required
Deprecation page Useful replacement and reason
Host redirect Supported rule, actual status/destination check
Remove source Build output and obsolete host file removal
Remove asset Direct old asset URL/cache check
Hide sidebar Presentation only, not retirement/privacy

Inventory inbound links, readers and assets first. A deprecation note should identify a usable replacement, not promise a future unwritten chapter. MarkStack creates no automatic redirect map.

Add-only host uploads can leave removed pages/assets accessible. Verify old URL and direct bytes after release. Confidential accidental publication needs incident/host response under an approved plan; hidden flag or deleting one Markdown link is not a remedy.

Keep one dependable record

Prefer one full installation/recovery procedure with links from related chapters, not many divergent copied command lists. Keep source history and protected runtime/artifact backups. Generated HTML and browser drafts do not reconstruct all accounts/settings/history/source intent.

After release, record changed reader tasks, actual checks and remaining untested conditions. Maintenance is complete when another person can understand intended source, published state and recovery without guessing. Validation limits and Backup and restore state measured versus operator responsibilities.